the latter you have some results to return. would you, for example rather give 15$ to a project to "improve their code" or invest 15$ in electricity to crunch it as it is? the first 15$ you'll get nothing in return to show for. a LOT of people (me included) need an "incentive" to donate. so was it a waste? I tend to disagree.Īlso there is the aspect of donations. like seti - they did not find a thing, but it lead to greater understanding on what NOT to look for. Science has also a lot to do with finding things that do NOT work.Įspecially in the beginning. some projects improve and change their models over time. If there was a way to build a model that does not rely on brute force, it would be implemented. "it" being also a way to donate money for science in small batches. it would be a waste if there was an alternative way of doing it. Prove me wrong that boinc isn't a waste if you disagree with me Like 500 megawatts at least and more likely over a gigawatt.
Ironic that some of these projects to make the world better are actually wasting energy and contributing to c02 emissions Before someone says boinc electric usage is insignificant, it's not. There is a direct correlation between electricity usage and increased c02 emissions from power plants. I think you should be careful which projects you chose to run because most don't do anything with the results and you are generating 99.999% statistical trash that doesn't get used.
#BOINC PROJECTS AND CANNABINOIDS CODE#
In computing you don't need to brute force solutions, you can get much better results by optimizing your code and coding efficiently. Look at How many trillions of galaxy spin model has it generated by now and what was the point. I have participated in and watched these projects for 10 years and the majority of them basically waste all the computational power.
#BOINC PROJECTS AND CANNABINOIDS FOR FREE#
Boinc projects do because they take advantage of the endless cpu power for free and a handful of grad students are the only ones who manage the projects with no incentive to improve anything because they are busy as students. Traditional supercomputers would not run this work because of how loose it is, it wouldn't be worth it. Millions of cpu and gpu cores times 50-150watts each to essentially brute force molecular dynamics simulations in an unfocused way. If your devices are running hot, and you can't add cooling, you can reduce heat by limiting the amount of CPU BOINC is permitted to use.ĭoes this sidebar need an addition or correction? Tell me here You run the risk of seriously damaging the components, or even starting a fire. ✻ Smokey says: clean exterior surfaces with a broom, not a hose, to fight climate change! Be smart with your electronics, never operate them with inadequate ventilation. Users can decide which projects they participate in, using the free and open-source BOINC client software. The only other factor I would take into consideration is that supposedly the M1 Minis only use 25Watts where I believe my Lenovos are probably using 80-100.A subreddit dedicated to all things BOINC, a platform enabling the public to volunteer their computer's processing capability towards research projects distributed across the globe. So maybe the Mini could spit out 50 WUs a day. The Macbook Air M1 is returning about 30 WUs a day on the same project but there is throttling going on. Lastly, if I bought a used M1 Mini for under $600, do you think it's a good price-for-performance for crunching World Community Grid? For reference, I have a bunch of i9 16-thread Wintel machines I bought a few years ago for $741 each and they crunch a lot! They return about 160 Work Units a day for the MCM project.
What Project(s) are you running? Have any screenshots of how much RAM all your CPU tasks are using? My mom's MBA with 8GB running MCM uses up all the RAM.so if the machines are the same chip with same # of cores yet double the RAM, I don't know why your Mini is using all the RAM. Thanks! I'm shocked that it's eating up all your RAM (granted the OS probably uses 2+).
0 kommentar(er)
